Delighted is being discontinued by June 2026, pushing many teams to look for a replacement. While Delighted’s simplicity made it popular, growing programmes often need deeper reporting, cleaner workflows, and better follow-through.
Here are our top three picks:
# | Tool | Best for |
1 | Eletive | Teams moving from simple surveys to a full engagement programme |
2 | Qualtrics | Advanced survey research at enterprise scale |
3 | Culture Amp | Enterprise engagement programmes with benchmarking |
Delighted is shutting down. What should you replace it with?
By 30 June 2026, Delighted will be discontinued. It will cease to operate and will no longer receive updates or support from Qualtrics. So, if you use it for NPS, CSAT, or quick pulse surveys, you’ll definitely need a replacement tool.
But the shutdown is not the only reason teams are looking. Many organisations were already running into gaps: limited year-over-year reporting, too much effort to control where web surveys appear, and messy workflows when multiple teams try to run different survey programmes at the same time.
So what should you use instead?
Here, we’ve shortlisted 11 Delighted alternatives. Each option fits a different use case, so you can choose based on the level of insight, workflow support, and scale you need.
Why trust us
We’re the team behind Eletive, an employee engagement and performance platform built for continuous listening and manager follow-through. We work with HR and people leaders who need real-time engagement insight across teams and a practical way to turn feedback into action.
Here’s what one customer says:
We see Eletive not just as a tool, but as a partner in our ongoing journey to enhance employee engagement and organisational development.
For this guide, we combined what teams liked about Delighted (simple surveys, quick rollouts) with what many teams needed next (stronger reporting, cleaner workflows, and better support for multi-team programmes). The result is a shortlist that helps you choose the right alternative based on your use case, the level of insight you need, and how you plan to act on feedback.
What is Delighted?
Delighted is a lightweight feedback tool designed to help teams collect and report on experience scores quickly. It’s best known for surveys like NPS, CSAT, and CES, and for how easy it is to launch short surveys across email, web, link, and in-product channels.
Delighted is used across different audiences from customers, employees, event attendees to product users and its core strength is simplicity. With it, you can set up a survey fast, collect responses with minimal friction, and see a clear score without much configuration or training.
Why consider a Delighted alternative?
Delighted is popular because of its simplicity. Many users describe it as “very intuitive” and “incredibly easy to navigate”. However, as feedback programmes mature and more teams begin relying on the same data, Delighted can start to feel limiting. Here are the most common reasons teams consider Delighted alternatives.
You need reporting that holds up year over year
Delighted’s reporting is easy to read. The challenge is depth over time. Once leadership asks for year-over-year movement, clearer trend lines, and more robust analysis, many teams start to feel the ceiling.
A mid-market user described the gap plainly: “There could be more features for reporting to help show us our results year over year.” Another put it this way: “There are times where I wish it was more advanced in the analytics area.” In practice, this often means exporting data, stitching reports together manually, or losing confidence in what the numbers are really saying over time.
You are doing too much manual work to get useful insight
When reporting starts spilling into spreadsheets, the tool is no longer saving time. It is just collecting data. That frustration shows up clearly in reviews. One user put it like this: “The absence of detailed reports and insights results in manual effort to obtain the necessary information.” If your team is spending hours cleaning, sorting, and interpreting responses outside the platform, it is usually a sign you have outgrown a lightweight feedback setup.
Multi-team programmes can create messy data
Delighted can work well when one team runs one programme. It gets harder when multiple departments run overlapping surveys and need clean separation.
A Customer Success Director described the impact: “Since multiple teams want to use Delighted, the scores land in only one spot in Salesforce… This means when our Support team uses it for CSAT, the NPS scores get messed up.”
In their case, it even felt like CSAT and NPS can’t run at the same time unless everything stays solely in Delighted. This is where teams start needing stronger governance: cleaner segmentation, clearer ownership, and workflows that scale across departments.
You need built-in follow-up, not just collection
Collecting feedback is the easy part. Closing the loop is where programmes succeed or stall.
One user highlighted a common gap: “We cannot respond to the feedback directly from the tool.” When follow-up is manual, it becomes slower, harder to track, and easy to drop, especially at scale.
11 best Delighted alternatives to try in 2026
Now that you know the most common reasons teams move on from Delighted, let’s look at the best alternatives. We’ve grouped these options by use case, so you can choose what fits your programme today and where you want it to go next.
Tool | Best for | Category | What it’s strongest at |
Eletive | Moving from simple surveys to a full employee engagement programme | Engagement + performance platform | Continuous listening + manager follow-through + segmentation |
Qualtrics (CoreXM/XM) | Advanced survey research and enterprise experience programmes | Experience management suite | Research-grade surveys, analytics, governance, multi-audience programmes |
Culture Amp | Enterprise engagement programmes with benchmarks | Engagement platform | People-science surveys + benchmarking + programme structure |
Workleap Officevibe | Lightweight employee listening with fast rollout | Engagement/pulse tool | Quick pulses, anonymous feedback, manager-friendly insights |
Lattice | Engagement plus performance management in one system | People management platform | Reviews, goals, feedback, engagement in one workflow |
Leapsome | Engagement tied to goals and development | People enablement platform | OKRs + reviews + learning connected to engagement |
Workday Peakon | Global continuous listening at enterprise scale | Enterprise engagement platform | Large-scale deployment, multilingual programmes, enterprise analytics |
TINYpulse | Anonymous feedback and simple pulse check-ins | Feedback + recognition tool | Psychological safety, lightweight pulses, recognition |
15Five | Manager-led check-ins and continuous feedback culture | Performance + engagement tool | Weekly check-ins, coaching habits, manager rhythm |
SurveyMonkey | Custom survey creation with full control | General survey tool | Flexible survey building across use cases (less engagement-specific) |
Microsoft Viva Glint | Microsoft-centric enterprises | Enterprise engagement tool (Viva) | Microsoft ecosystem fit, enterprise governance, leader/manager insights |
1. Eletive
Best for: teams looking to move beyond just 'measuring' (as with Delighted) and start actively working to improve culture and increase employee retention.
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/1200x569/b14e15689f/eletive-comparison.png)
Eletive focuses on continuous employee listening and manager-led follow-through at scale. It combines real-time pulse surveys with people analytics and practical manager tools, so organisations can see what is changing across teams, roles, locations, and managers, and respond while it still matters.
For teams moving on from Delighted, Eletive becomes the stronger choice when simple survey scores are no longer enough. It supports deeper insight, clearer ownership, and structured action, rather than stopping at reporting.
Aside from measuring engagement, Eletive helps managers act on feedback through built-in support for 1:1s, check-ins, goal-setting, and performance conversations, turning feedback into visible, trackable progress over time.
Key features
Real-time pulse surveys with instant dashboards, heat maps, and flexible segmentation
Advanced people analytics for complex organisations and matrix structures
AI-powered insights to analyse open-text feedback and surface themes at scale
Manager enablement tools for 1:1s, check-ins, goal-setting, and performance conversations
Action planning and follow-up to close the feedback loop and track progress
Performance management options including 360 feedback and OKR tracking
Designed for frontline and deskless teams, with strong accessibility
40+ languages to support multi-country workforces
HRIS integrations to reduce admin and keep data accurate
Pros
Clear step up from lightweight survey tools like Delighted
Built for continuous listening, not annual or ad-hoc surveys
Strong segmentation and visibility across teams, locations, and roles
Helps managers turn feedback into concrete actions, not just reports
Works well for growing organisations with complex structures
Cons
More structured than ultra-lightweight survey tools
Requires thoughtful rollout and manager onboarding to get full value
May be more than needed if you only want a simple score check
G2 rating: 4.6 out of 5
Pricing model: Custom (based on organisation size and needs)
2. Qualtrics (CoreXM / XM Suite)
Best for: advanced customer survey research and enterprise-scale experience programmes
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2724x1292/aaeac004d8/qualtrics.png)
Qualtrics is the parent company of Delighted, and it has announced Delighted will sunset by 30 June 2026 as it aligns product offerings to its AI-powered Suites.
In other words, the shutdown is not just a product change, it’s a portfolio decision. For some teams, that points naturally to Qualtrics. For others, like HR teams, it’s a reminder to choose a tool that matches how they actually run feedback, without paying for customer-focused feature they will not use.
Key features
Advanced survey logic and highly flexible question design
Powerful analytics, dashboards, and enterprise reporting
Text analytics and sentiment analysis for open-ended feedback
Multi-audience programmes (employees, customers, product, brand)
API access and integrations for custom workflows
Enterprise admin controls and governance features
Pros
Very flexible for complex research and survey programmes
Strong analytics and reporting at enterprise scale
Handles large datasets and multiple programmes well
Useful text analytics for qualitative feedback
Cons
Often expensive compared to most alternatives
Can feel like overkill for simple engagement or pulse surveys
Steeper learning curve, especially for non-research teams
Usually needs dedicated ownership to run well
G2 rating: 4.4 out of 5
Pricing model: Custom (enterprise pricing)
3. Culture Amp
Best for: larger organisations that want an enterprise-grade employee engagement programme with benchmarks
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2860x1248/78becf7833/cultureamp.png)
Culture Amp focuses on running research-backed employee engagement programmes at scale.
The platform centres on people-science-driven surveys, deep benchmarking, and analytics that make it easy to compare engagement across teams, functions, and the wider organisation. On higher-tier plans, Culture Amp also extends into performance and development, allowing organisations to manage engagement, growth, and feedback within fewer systems.
Key features
Engagement surveys for key moments (onboarding, offboarding, pulse), with configurable templates
Benchmarks and comparative reporting, one of Culture Amp’s strongest differentiators
AI-assisted analysis and recommendations to help teams interpret results faster
HRIS integrations and admin controls designed for larger organisations
Modular plans that can include performance and development workflows (plan-dependent)
Pros
Strong fit for organisations that value benchmarks and research-backed survey frameworks
Built for enterprise rollouts, with robust permissions, integrations, and admin tooling
Can consolidate multiple people programmes when using more than one module
Cons
Can feel heavy if you only want lightweight pulse surveys
Typically higher cost and more process-driven than simple survey tools
Implementation and internal change management can take longer, especially across multiple teams
G2 rating: 4.5 out of 5
Pricing model: Custom (enterprise pricing available)
4. Workleap Officevibe
Best for: small to mid-sized teams that want lightweight employee listening with a fast rollout
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2828x998/e434658690/workleap.png)
Officevibe keeps engagement tracking simple and consistent.
It centres on regular pulse surveys, anonymous feedback, and manager-friendly summaries, so teams can start listening without building a heavy programme. If Delighted was your lightweight way to collect internal sentiment, Officevibe offers a more purpose-built employee feedback setup with quick deployment, clear trends, and manager guidance to support follow-through.
Key features
Pulse surveys with ready-to-use question banks
Anonymous feedback channels for ongoing input
Trend reporting and engagement summaries
Recognition features to reinforce positive behaviours
Manager resources and suggested actions to support follow-through
Integrations with common workplace tools (plan-dependent)
Pros
Easy to launch and easy for managers to adopt
Low barrier to entry for teams formalising engagement for the first time
Clear, manager-friendly reporting for recurring pulse programmes
Useful mix of surveys, feedback, and recognition in one place
Cons
Less depth than enterprise platforms for advanced analytics and complex org structures
Segmentation and customisation can feel limited for mature programmes
Action planning is lighter than platforms built for structured, organisation-wide change
G2 rating: 4.4 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription, typically priced per user/employee
5. Lattice
Best for: companies that want employee engagement and performance management in one system
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2806x1290/93a4bcb4f1/lattica.png)
Lattice brings engagement surveys into the same platform as performance reviews, goals, and ongoing feedback. Instead of treating engagement as a standalone programme, it connects measurement to the routines managers already run like 1:1s, reviews, praise, and goal tracking. If you are moving away from a survey-first tool like Delighted, Lattice makes sense when your next platform needs to do more than collect sentiment.
Key features
Engagement surveys with customisable questions
Performance reviews and 360-degree feedback
Goal tracking and OKR management
Continuous feedback and praise
Compensation management tools (module-based)
1:1 meeting templates and manager workflows
Pros
Helps reduce tool sprawl by bringing multiple people workflows into one platform
Strong manager workflows that connect engagement with performance routines
Modern interface that is easy for employees to use
Solid integrations ecosystem
Cons
Heavier than engagement-only platforms
Higher learning curve due to multiple modules
Can feel like overkill if you only need engagement surveys
Costs typically rise as you add modules
G2 rating: 4.7 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription-based, modular pricing
6. Leapsome
Best for: linking engagement to performance, goals, and development in one system
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2782x1236/5e62e2da80/leapsome.png)
Leapsome connects engagement surveys with the day-to-day people processes that shape how work feels: goals, reviews, feedback, and development. The platform is a strong fit when you want engagement to feed directly into manager routines and growth conversations, rather than living in a separate survey tool.
Key features
Engagement surveys with customisable frameworks
OKRs and goal management
Performance reviews and ongoing feedback
Learning and development modules (plan-dependent)
Meeting and 1:1 tools to support manager routines
Compensation review cycles (module-based)
Pros
Strong alignment between engagement signals and business goals
Modern interface with a solid user experience
Flexible enough for different organisational structures
Good balance between depth and usability across modules
Cons
Setup can take longer because multiple modules connect together
Not an engagement-only tool, which may be more than some teams need
Works best with buy-in across goals, reviews, and development processes
May require dedicated admin ownership as you scale
G2 rating: 4.8 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription-based, modular pricing
7. Workday Peakon (Employee Voice)
Best for: large, global organisations that want continuous employee listening at enterprise scale
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2860x1068/378628fa2f/workday-peakon.png)
Workday Peakon is built for continuous employee listening across complex, multi-country organisations. It combines regular feedback collection with enterprise analytics and manager-facing insights, helping large HR teams track engagement across business units and act consistently at scale.
Peakon is especially relevant if your organisation already runs on Workday. The tight connection with Workday HCM makes it easier to link survey results with people data and reduce admin overhead for large deployments.
Key features
Continuous listening with real-time analytics and automated insights
Manager dashboards that prioritise actions and highlight where support is needed
Large-scale rollout support across multiple business units
Multilingual survey support for global workforces
Integration with Workday HCM (strongest fit when Workday is your system of record)
Heat maps and segmentation for organisation-wide visibility
Pros
Enterprise-ready and proven at large scale
Strong analytics with automated insight surfacing
Excellent fit for global organisations running multi-country programmes
Clear manager dashboards designed to drive action
Cons
Enterprise pricing can be significant
Less suitable for small and mid-sized teams that want lightweight rollout
Works best with mature HR operations and clear programme ownership
Implementation can take time, especially across regions and business units
G2 rating: 4.6 out of 5
Pricing model: Custom (enterprise pricing)
8. TINYpulse (WebMD Health Services)
Best for: anonymous employee feedback and simple, recurring pulse check-ins
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2846x998/cc95e5adc3/tinypulse.png)
TINYpulse keeps employee feedback lightweight and consistent. It encourages honest input through regular anonymous questions, making it a practical option when psychological safety and participation matter more than complex analytics. Alongside pulse surveys, TINYpulse also includes recognition features, which helps balance constructive feedback with positive reinforcement and day-to-day morale building.
Key features
Anonymous pulse surveys (often run as short, recurring questions)
Suggestion box for anonymous ideas and concerns
Simple manager dashboards and basic sentiment tracking
Peer recognition tools (for example, “Cheers for Peers”)
Participation and trend visibility over time
Pros
Strong anonymity focus, which can increase honesty and response rates
Easy to adopt with minimal training
Recognition features help reinforce positive behaviour
Straightforward setup for smaller teams
Cons
Less depth than analytics-heavy engagement platforms
Reporting and segmentation are more basic
Action planning is lighter than programme-led tools
Can be limiting for complex organisations or advanced use cases
G2 rating: 4.4 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription-based, typically priced per employee/user
9. 15Five
Best for: manager-led check-ins and building a continuous feedback culture
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2672x1250/4e0fa3af18/15five.png)
15Five is built around a simple idea: engagement improves when managers stay close to their teams, consistently. Its weekly check-ins create a steady rhythm for sharing wins, blockers, and sentiment, so managers can respond in real time instead of waiting for a quarterly survey cycle.
It also brings reviews, goals, and recognition into the same workflow, which helps teams connect engagement signals to day-to-day performance conversations without juggling multiple tools.
Key features
Weekly check-ins with customisable questions
Engagement surveys (including options tied to Best-Self Review)
Performance review tools and structured feedback cycles
OKR tracking and goal alignment
Manager effectiveness assessments and coaching support
Recognition features (for example, “high fives”)
Pros
Strong focus on manager coaching and leadership habits
Encourages consistent feedback, not just survey participation
Practical mix of check-ins, recognition, and performance routines
Fits organisations investing in manager development
Cons
Survey analytics can feel lighter than specialist engagement platforms
Broad scope means it may not go as deep on engagement as programme-led tools
Needs manager consistency to get the full value from check-ins
Can feel like extra work if teams do not adopt the rhythm
G2 rating: 4.6 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription-based, typically priced per employee/user
10. SurveyMonkey
Best for: teams that want full control over custom survey creation (beyond engagement)
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2828x1178/1f012558f0/surveymonkey.png)
SurveyMonkey is a general-purpose survey and forms tool. It gives you the building blocks to create, send, and analyse surveys for almost any use case, including employee feedback, without locking you into an engagement-specific programme.
For a Delighted replacement, SurveyMonkey fits best when you mainly need a flexible survey engine and you are comfortable handling follow-up and action planning outside the tool. It is less ideal if you want manager workflows, continuous listening structure, or engagement-specific guidance built in.
Key features
Drag-and-drop survey builder with customisable question types
Large template library for common survey formats
Multiple distribution channels (email, link, web, embed)
Logic and branching for more tailored survey flows
Basic analytics and reporting dashboards
Exports and integrations (plan-dependent)
Pros
Very flexible across many survey types and departments
Familiar interface and widely adopted brand
Useful for teams that want control over question design and formats
Affordable entry plans for basic survey needs
Cons
Not engagement-specific, so it lacks manager enablement and built-in follow-through
Action planning and closing-the-loop workflows are limited
Reporting can feel basic unless you move to higher tiers
You may need other tools to run a complete engagement programme
G2 rating: 4.4 out of 5
Pricing model: subscription-based (freemium with paid tiers)
11. Glint (Microsoft Viva Glint)
Best for: Microsoft-centric enterprises running engagement at scale
:format(png)/f/288714721386412/2802x1056/874821b289/glint.png)
Glint sits inside the Microsoft Viva ecosystem as Viva Glint, and it’s built for large organisations that want to run employee listening programmes with enterprise governance. You get engagement surveys, leader and manager views, and insights designed to scale across business units with the advantage of fitting naturally into Microsoft 365 environments.
For a Delighted replacement, Glint makes the most sense when your organisation already lives in Teams and Microsoft 365 and you want employee listening to plug into that ecosystem rather than adding another standalone platform.
Key features
Engagement surveys and people-science-based measurement strategy
Enterprise analytics with automated insight surfacing and leader/manager dashboards
Microsoft ecosystem fit (Teams/Microsoft 365 prerequisites and Viva suite packaging)
Action and follow-through support through manager-facing insights and guidance
Integrations with Viva tools (for example, Viva Insights data flowing into Viva Glint)
Pros
Strong fit for enterprise organisations already standardised on Microsoft 365 and Teams
Built to scale across large, complex structures with central governance
Benefits from Microsoft’s Viva roadmap (including Copilot support in Viva Glint)
Cons
Less suitable for SMBs looking for a lightweight survey tool (enterprise motion, enterprise setup)
Licensing and prerequisites can be a factor (for example, minimum seat requirements and Microsoft licensing dependencies)
Best value shows up when you commit to the wider Microsoft ecosystem, not as a standalone add-on
G2 rating: 4.6 out of 5
Pricing model: Custom (typically via Microsoft enterprise licensing/Viva packaging)
Choosing the right Delighted alternative
Delighted worked because it was simple. If your needs are still lightweight, a survey-first tool may be enough.
But if the shutdown is pushing you to level up, choose a platform that does more than collect scores. One that helps you understand what’s changing across the organisation and supports real follow-through after feedback comes in. That’s exactly where Eletive fits.
Eletive combines continuous listening with manager-led action, so feedback turns into visible progress you can track over time. Ready to replace Delighted with a tool built for real engagement?
Book a demo with Eletive here.

























:format(jpeg)/f/288714721386412/1280x720/940c479a26/delighted-alternatives.jpg)

:format(jpeg)/f/288714721386412/1280x720/154d0efc4c/tinypulse-alternatives-hero.jpg)
:format(jpeg)/f/288714721386412/1280x720/94229f239a/blog-11-best-people-analytics-tools-in-2026.jpg)
:format(jpeg)/f/288714721386412/e490991a3d/blog-employee-feedback-software-hero_media.jpg)